Welcome to our board! Log In Create A New Profile
Use mobile view

Advanced

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

May 10, 2016 06:44AM
It was my impression that this sort of colloquialism/grammar laxity (phrasing questions with straight word order and a question mark/inflection is a modern sort of informality, not a 200 years old one - although it's possible that it only made its way into written English recently. The way I understand it, classical writers tended to keep the elite/normative forms of expression, contrary to modernish writers who tend to mirror everyday speech and slang in their writing. I understand JA used contractions and colloquialisms when put into the mouth of her less refined, less educated, vulgar characters (Lydia, Mrs. Bennet). I recognize, of course, that as a non-native speaker I will not recognize every subtlety and informal usage the way a native speaker does.
SubjectAuthorPosted

" You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 01:38PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

KentMay 10, 2016 07:06PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Suzanne OMay 10, 2016 02:54PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 10, 2016 06:20PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Suzanne OMay 10, 2016 07:48PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 10, 2016 10:09PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Agnes BeatrixMay 09, 2016 11:23AM

English/Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Rae ElaineMay 10, 2016 11:56PM

Re: English

Mari A.May 11, 2016 06:59AM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Sarah WaldockMay 09, 2016 07:49PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 09, 2016 11:07PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Agnes BeatrixMay 10, 2016 06:44AM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

PeterMay 09, 2016 04:39PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 09, 2016 02:07PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

RebeccaLSMay 08, 2016 03:59PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 06:28PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jean M.May 08, 2016 05:48PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Rae ElaineMay 09, 2016 12:48AM

But Darcy doesn't know that about the Gardiners at that point in the novel.

GracielaMay 09, 2016 07:01PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 09, 2016 11:04AM

This has always been my interpretation as well. (nfm)

PeterMay 09, 2016 12:08AM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Rae ElaineMay 08, 2016 03:11PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

MichelleAMay 08, 2016 05:37PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 10:48PM

Re: I read it that way too, Michelle (nfm)

Sarah WaldockMay 08, 2016 07:46PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 06:57PM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 21 plus 23?
Message: