Welcome to our board! Log In Create A New Profile
Use mobile view

Advanced

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

May 08, 2016 06:57PM
Some interesting points from all, which cannot (ahem) be either condoned or denied with any certainy. Darcy was a well educated and intelligent man, of that there is little doubt, and he may have found it surprising to find another intelligent soul in a country environ if the likes of Mrs Bennet were any sort of benchmark. We know his views on the locals and also on propriety, but Lizzy wasn't alone in her manners catching his eye. He also praised Jane and Charlotte Lucas as worthy of attention. Granted, he may have been uttering an outside the box form of praise in Lizzy's direction by his remarks, but could he really expect her to denigrate her own family, friends and neighbours by agreeing with him? At that point, as his impending proposal was to illustrate, his views on lowering himself to Lizzy's level (amd thus all concerned with her) were nothing short of insulting. But then again, much depends on how the reader sees Darcy in return at that point.

In short, he could not know anything of Lizzy, but his ego told him differently. Nothing in the story indicates that the Bennets had not always lived in Longbourne and the girls had not been born and raised there.
SubjectAuthorPosted

" You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 01:38PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

KentMay 10, 2016 07:06PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Suzanne OMay 10, 2016 02:54PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 10, 2016 06:20PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Suzanne OMay 10, 2016 07:48PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 10, 2016 10:09PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Agnes BeatrixMay 09, 2016 11:23AM

English/Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Rae ElaineMay 10, 2016 11:56PM

Re: English

Mari A.May 11, 2016 06:59AM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Sarah WaldockMay 09, 2016 07:49PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 09, 2016 11:07PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Agnes BeatrixMay 10, 2016 06:44AM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

PeterMay 09, 2016 04:39PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 09, 2016 02:07PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

RebeccaLSMay 08, 2016 03:59PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 06:28PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jean M.May 08, 2016 05:48PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Rae ElaineMay 09, 2016 12:48AM

But Darcy doesn't know that about the Gardiners at that point in the novel.

GracielaMay 09, 2016 07:01PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 09, 2016 11:04AM

This has always been my interpretation as well. (nfm)

PeterMay 09, 2016 12:08AM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Rae ElaineMay 08, 2016 03:11PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

MichelleAMay 08, 2016 05:37PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 10:48PM

Re: I read it that way too, Michelle (nfm)

Sarah WaldockMay 08, 2016 07:46PM

Re: " You cannot have been always at longbourn!"

Jim G.MMay 08, 2016 06:57PM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 2 plus 2?
Message: