Welcome to our board! Log In Create A New Profile
Use mobile view

Advanced

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

April 30, 2016 10:29PM
I get the feeling you are putting words into my mouth here Agnes.

Firstly, I am talking fan fiction but using basic canon. I am also offering alternate scenarios as per Peter's story. That said, I have no cause to withdraw what I said which was that Darcy's case was finally won by Lizzie's realisation of his kindness. Lizzie was never in any way linked with local suitors in P&P,( although had Darcy not appeared she may well have been so. Both hers and Jane's options were a little thin on the ground I'd say) that's just suggested scenarios and my statement was metaphoric. I simply stated ( quite clearly) that Darcy's case was won by Lizzie finding out about his action when he had no intention of that happening. It's also true that local suitors were hardly likely to be able to afford travelling two hundred miles and paying off Wickham's debts as Darcy did. None of that is untrue or incorrect as I see it? The deciding factor was Lizzie's not Darcy's as he didn't think she would find out about his actions and was disappointed when she did, thinking Aunt Gardiner had disclosed it intentionally. As far as I can see none of my comments contradict each other? Darcy also freely admitted doing what he did solely for Lizzie and no other reason. Hope this clears things up.

I do wonder how he would have proposed again had Lizzie not discovered his part in it all and thanked him so effusively giving him an opening, but that's another story.
SubjectAuthorPosted

Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 28, 2016 03:14PM

Please, the character's name was Lizzy, not Lizzie (nfm)

Margaret FMay 04, 2016 09:47PM

It was Elizabeth actually, but hey-ho..(-: N.F.M

Jim G.MMay 04, 2016 10:23PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatApril 30, 2016 06:26AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 12:42PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 01, 2016 04:16AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 01, 2016 12:32PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 02, 2016 05:07AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 02:05PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 03, 2016 01:44AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 03, 2016 07:48PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 03, 2016 10:02PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterMay 04, 2016 01:39AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 04, 2016 10:35PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 04, 2016 01:02PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterMay 04, 2016 03:21PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 04, 2016 06:49PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterMay 03, 2016 11:37AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixMay 01, 2016 04:32PM

Just a thought

PeterMay 01, 2016 08:58PM

Re: Just a thought

Deb PMay 02, 2016 03:25AM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 01:26PM

Re: Just a thought

AmytatMay 03, 2016 01:51AM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 02, 2016 04:13PM

Re: Just a thought

PeterMay 02, 2016 04:57PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 06:49PM

Re: Just a thought

AmytatMay 03, 2016 01:46AM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 02, 2016 09:33PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 10:58PM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 02, 2016 09:30PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 04:48PM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 03, 2016 07:54PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 01, 2016 11:52PM

Re: Just a thought

AmytatMay 02, 2016 05:14AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 30, 2016 01:31PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 03:12PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 30, 2016 08:12PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 10:29PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 29, 2016 10:09PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 12:08AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 30, 2016 07:40AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterApril 28, 2016 11:09PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 12:04AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterApril 29, 2016 01:04AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 11:44AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterApril 29, 2016 01:40PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 02:20PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Rae ElaineApril 28, 2016 09:28PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 28, 2016 10:41PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatApril 30, 2016 06:19AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

DorotheeApril 28, 2016 06:06PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 28, 2016 06:17PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Sarah WaldockApril 29, 2016 02:20PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 06:35PM

The entire point of P&P

Femme MalheureuseApril 29, 2016 08:26PM

Re: The entire point of P&P

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 08:42PM

Want, Need, Love

Femme MalheureuseApril 29, 2016 10:05PM

Where Mr. Collins says anything about holding hands or kissing?

GracielaApril 29, 2016 07:18PM

Re: Where Mr. Collins says anything about holding hands or kissing?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 08:17PM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 18 plus 7?
Message: