Welcome to our board! Log In Create A New Profile
Use mobile view

Advanced

The entire point of P&P

April 29, 2016 08:26PM
Quote

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.

However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.

The very first sentence is the challenge laid out to the readers for deeper examination. Is this a truth? Must this man "want" a wife? What is the nature of a "good fortune" let alone "want"?

However little known the feelings or views of such a man -- this is the second challenge to be overcome. The feelings and views in the case of Fitzwilliam Darcy were obstructive to the beliefs of some one or other of their daughters.

We may believe initiallyDarcy's feelings or views are that of a charmless, withdrawn snob, but it is only over time we realize his fortune is purely economic, not emotional or spiritual as he has been deeply deprived. What is it he really wants and needs?

We may believe initially that Darcy is the rightful object of some one or other daughter, no matter what his feelings or views, but the man is not an object, not simply a bundle of economic objectives. He is still human and must be won over, by meeting his wants and needs -- indeed, in spite of his own lack of awareness and inability to articulate his true wants and needs.

And while the challenge and objective laid out in the first two sentences are bound up in the single man of good fortune, the truth is that the story is about the development of a fundamental human system based upon a pair bond -- the yin and yang, meeting and becoming one. Whatever we must learn about Darcy in the course of P&P, we must also learn about his mate, the yin to his yang.

We may believe initially that Elizabeth is a headstrong, sarcastic, and naive spirit, but it is only over time we realize her best features are her openness to learning and changing her mind, and her loyalty once earned. What is it she needs to self-actualize?

We may believe initially that Elizabeth will marry only for the deepest love, but that ethic must be sorely tested else it is nothing but mere platitude.

And on top of it complicating the challenge is the nascent and ephemeral biological attraction, simmering below waistcoats and corsets, masked by gloves and hats, muted by societal norms. Austen never really explores this except in the undisciplined ids Wickham and Lydia represent, contrasted against the ruthless demands of superego manifest in Charlotte and Mr. Collins.

It's the very crux of P&P to look beyond the superficial attributes of Darcy and Elizabeth, to weigh them against alternatives, and discover what it is that drives these two very different individuals meld into one.

We can say that neither Darcy or Elizabeth are good catches -- but that's the whole point. We none of us are. It's the human condition, yet we manage to create matches anyhow.
SubjectAuthorPosted

Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 28, 2016 03:14PM

Please, the character's name was Lizzy, not Lizzie (nfm)

Margaret FMay 04, 2016 09:47PM

It was Elizabeth actually, but hey-ho..(-: N.F.M

Jim G.MMay 04, 2016 10:23PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatApril 30, 2016 06:26AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 12:42PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 01, 2016 04:16AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 01, 2016 12:32PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 02, 2016 05:07AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 02:05PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 03, 2016 01:44AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 03, 2016 07:48PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 03, 2016 10:02PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterMay 04, 2016 01:39AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatMay 04, 2016 10:35PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 04, 2016 01:02PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterMay 04, 2016 03:21PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MMay 04, 2016 06:49PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterMay 03, 2016 11:37AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixMay 01, 2016 04:32PM

Just a thought

PeterMay 01, 2016 08:58PM

Re: Just a thought

Deb PMay 02, 2016 03:25AM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 01:26PM

Re: Just a thought

AmytatMay 03, 2016 01:51AM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 02, 2016 04:13PM

Re: Just a thought

PeterMay 02, 2016 04:57PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 06:49PM

Re: Just a thought

AmytatMay 03, 2016 01:46AM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 02, 2016 09:33PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 10:58PM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 02, 2016 09:30PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 02, 2016 04:48PM

Re: Just a thought

Sarah WaldockMay 03, 2016 07:54PM

Re: Just a thought

Jim G.MMay 01, 2016 11:52PM

Re: Just a thought

AmytatMay 02, 2016 05:14AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 30, 2016 01:31PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 03:12PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 30, 2016 08:12PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 10:29PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 29, 2016 10:09PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 30, 2016 12:08AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Agnes BeatrixApril 30, 2016 07:40AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterApril 28, 2016 11:09PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 12:04AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterApril 29, 2016 01:04AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 11:44AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

PeterApril 29, 2016 01:40PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 02:20PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Rae ElaineApril 28, 2016 09:28PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 28, 2016 10:41PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

AmytatApril 30, 2016 06:19AM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

DorotheeApril 28, 2016 06:06PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 28, 2016 06:17PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Sarah WaldockApril 29, 2016 02:20PM

Re: Were Lizzie or Darcy really good catches?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 06:35PM

The entire point of P&P

Femme MalheureuseApril 29, 2016 08:26PM

Re: The entire point of P&P

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 08:42PM

Want, Need, Love

Femme MalheureuseApril 29, 2016 10:05PM

Where Mr. Collins says anything about holding hands or kissing?

GracielaApril 29, 2016 07:18PM

Re: Where Mr. Collins says anything about holding hands or kissing?

Jim G.MApril 29, 2016 08:17PM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 4 plus 18?
Message: