Welcome to our board! Log In Create A New Profile
Use mobile view

Advanced

Re: Mocking

April 14, 2015 12:29PM
Please accept this in the right spirit. It isn't meant to be argumentative but just my view and may explain why I see things as I do. It is the reason I argue points:

Pride and Prejudice is a social comedy. It is one of my very favourite books in this genre. Almost all about it is unreal. Jane Austen, was a single woman with little or no experience of romance and not too much of life itself (she died a parson''s daughter who lived in a leafy, rural world, at the age of just 41 years) She wrote romantic fiction, with the emphasis on "fiction" from her closeted, safe little world. As everyone who reads her, here and elsewhere, well knows she was an intelligent woman who lived 200 years ago. All agreed so far?

Can we then remember that her own views in reality may just differ from those she wrote in Pride and Prejudice and the rest, which again may differ from our own slightly more modern views and opinions.?. None of us are experts on her works, we see them as we see them as individuals. Personally, I believe she gave us that levity by being scarce in descriptive writing. Do any one of us have any idea outside of our imaginations and film adaptations, what any of her characters actually looked like? She was tweaking more than a few noses. Back to P&P. In the main J.A took a very few reasonably balanced and possibly believable characters and mixed them with the totally ridiculous:

Mr Collins is made an utter buffoon in every sense. Charlotte Lucas is a counter balance weight to stop him falling off the world's edge. Mrs Bennet is totally feather-brained as are her two youngest daughters. Her husband is a poor father and leaves them all in the lurch for us to feel sorry for despite them living a pretty decent sort of high life riding about in carriages with lots of frocks, plenty food and balls and supper parties galore. . Mary Bennet lives in cuckoo land. Sir William Lucas is a bumbler living in visions of past glory at St James's Court. Lady Catherine de Bourgh is a bombastic prune of a woman who tells it when to rain. Her daughter is but a passing draught when a door opens and Colonel Fitzwilliam a part-believable chocolate tin soldier. As for the real main characters, Bingley and Jane Bennet are cardboard cut-out characters with little or no real input in the story, Elizabeth Bennet, despite her drastic prejudice, is made totally heroic and J.A unashamedly admitted she was a favourite child in her fiction. Darcy is too ridiculous for words. A pompous, handsome, upper-crust man of great wealth who thinks ill of most of humanity, sees himself as too good for the world to tarnish, yet condescends to dismount from his unicorn and do great deeds as Lizzie works her unspoken magic on him.George Wickham, vallainous though he be, is about the nearest character who we may actually encounter on the streets of reality along with Mr and Mrs Gardiner. As a comedy of manner it is quite hilarious. This is how I read the book. Jane Austen mixed and matched them all into a humourous and happy-ending tale that we are still reading those 200 years later. . Such was her talent for life outside the real world.

I love Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice and have done so for many years,. I have a decent hard-back version and a couple of paperbacks of it always around. I quite like the rest of her novels (although with much less awe and none of them have quit the same impact). I love her sense of atmosphere and the way it conjures up the past, candle-light, quill pens and the rattle of carriage wheels (not forgetting the horse manure of course( (-:

What I don't do is fall down in adoration before a statue of St Jane, fill my house with Jane memorabillia or, despite living in England, wish to visit her history or believe a word of what she writes outside of her letters. I don't believe for a minute she would want that. If I ever do that, I may as well just read Alice in Wonderland. (-:
SubjectAuthorPosted

Hunsford.

Jim G.MMarch 19, 2015 07:14PM

Re: Hunsford.

AmytatApril 11, 2015 08:03PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jim G.MApril 11, 2015 10:26PM

Re: Hunsford.

Amy A-NWMarch 26, 2015 07:13PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jim G.MMarch 26, 2015 09:16PM

Re: Hunsford.

PearlMarch 20, 2015 06:40PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jim G.MMarch 21, 2015 12:05PM

Re: Hunsford.

Harvey S.March 21, 2015 10:20PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jim G.MMarch 21, 2015 10:37PM

Re: Hunsford.

AlidaMarch 22, 2015 12:31AM

Re: Hunsford.

AdelaideMarch 22, 2015 01:40AM

Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

Agnes BeatrixMarch 26, 2015 06:25PM

Re: Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

Jim G.MMarch 26, 2015 09:11PM

Re: Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

AmytatApril 12, 2015 05:26PM

Re: Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

Jim G.MApril 13, 2015 11:40AM

Mocking

AmytatApril 14, 2015 04:03AM

Re: Mocking

Jim G.MApril 14, 2015 12:29PM

Re: Mocking

AmytatApril 16, 2015 01:03PM

Re: Mocking

Jim G.MApril 16, 2015 01:57PM

Re: Mocking

AmytatApril 17, 2015 12:53AM

Appearances

Debra McApril 14, 2015 07:16PM

Re: Mocking

Mari A.April 14, 2015 02:57PM

Re: Mocking

Jim G.MApril 15, 2015 12:00PM

Amytat, I agree with you

AdelaideApril 14, 2015 12:09PM

Re: Amytat, I agree with you

AmytatApril 14, 2015 09:40PM

Re: Amytat, I agree with you

Jim G.MApril 14, 2015 02:00PM

Error? Did things get a little muddled here?

AmytatApril 14, 2015 09:37PM

Mr. Collins and Charlotte

AdelaideApril 14, 2015 02:17AM

Re: Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

Agnes BeatrixApril 03, 2015 09:55PM

Re: Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

Jim G.MApril 04, 2015 12:20AM

Re: Mr. Bennet and Mr. Collins

AdelaideMarch 26, 2015 09:09PM

Mr Bennet

Harvey S.March 23, 2015 05:44AM

Re: Mr Bennet

AdelaideMarch 23, 2015 11:04AM

Re: Mr Bennet

Jean M.March 23, 2015 08:20PM

I could not agree more

Harvey S.March 28, 2015 08:44PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MMarch 29, 2015 12:18AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Mari A.April 01, 2015 09:16AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MApril 01, 2015 02:31PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Mari A.April 02, 2015 10:20AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jean M.April 01, 2015 07:28PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

AmytatApril 12, 2015 05:53PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

KarenteaApril 01, 2015 11:34PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

AdelaideApril 01, 2015 11:59PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Harvey S.April 02, 2015 04:02AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MApril 02, 2015 11:54AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Harvey S.April 05, 2015 07:26AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MApril 05, 2015 01:12PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Harvey S.April 07, 2015 06:26PM

Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Jean M.April 05, 2015 03:05PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Harvey S.April 07, 2015 06:27PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Jim G.MApril 05, 2015 05:08PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Harvey S.April 07, 2015 06:05PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Agnes BeatrixApril 06, 2015 09:04PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

AmytatApril 12, 2015 11:19PM

A point for Mr Bennet.

Jim G.MApril 07, 2015 12:49AM

Re: A point for Mr Bennet.

Harvey S.April 07, 2015 06:31PM

Re: A point for Mr Bennet.

Jim G.MApril 07, 2015 08:50PM

Re: A point for Mr Bennet.

Harvey S.April 09, 2015 05:49PM

Well actually...

Suzanne OApril 08, 2015 08:03PM

Re: Well actually...

Jim G.MApril 08, 2015 09:41PM

Re: Well actually...

AmytatApril 09, 2015 07:26PM

Re: Well actually...

Suzanne OApril 09, 2015 12:04AM

Re: Well actually...

Jim G.MApril 09, 2015 12:46AM

Re: Well actually...

Suzanne OApril 09, 2015 02:34AM

Thank you Suzanne

Debra McApril 09, 2015 12:42AM

Re: Thank you Suzanne

Harvey S.April 09, 2015 05:56PM

Re: Thank you Suzanne

Jim G.MApril 09, 2015 11:37AM

Re: Thank you Suzanne

Harvey S.April 09, 2015 06:02PM

Re: A point for Mr Bennet.

AdelaideApril 07, 2015 12:59PM

Re: A point for Mr Bennet.

Jim G.MApril 07, 2015 03:04PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Jim G.MApril 06, 2015 10:26PM

A minority opinion

RedsonApril 07, 2015 12:45AM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

AdelaideApril 05, 2015 04:04PM

Re: Has Mr. Bennet's character changed?

Harvey S.April 07, 2015 06:46PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Agnes BeatrixApril 03, 2015 09:35PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MApril 04, 2015 12:08AM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Agnes BeatrixApril 04, 2015 10:29PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MApril 04, 2015 11:38PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

JanetRApril 04, 2015 08:23PM

Re: I could not agree more. ?

Jim G.MApril 04, 2015 08:35PM

I'm not sure what you mean

GracielaApril 06, 2015 06:41AM

Re: I'm not sure what you mean

Jim G.MApril 06, 2015 12:12PM

Re: Mr Bennet

Suzanne OMarch 26, 2015 03:15AM

Great comments, Jean M, IMO

AdelaideMarch 23, 2015 09:34PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jim G.MMarch 22, 2015 11:52AM

Re: Hunsford.

AdelaideMarch 22, 2015 01:02PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jim G.MMarch 22, 2015 04:05PM

Re: Hunsford.

AlidaMarch 22, 2015 10:28AM

Re: Hunsford.

AdelaideMarch 22, 2015 12:52PM

Re: Hunsford.

AlidaMarch 23, 2015 05:11AM

Re: Hunsford.

AdelaideMarch 23, 2015 11:21AM

Re: Hunsford.

AlidaMarch 23, 2015 08:19PM

Re: Hunsford.

Jean M.March 23, 2015 08:32PM

Re: Hunsford.

mpinneyMarch 20, 2015 12:10PM

I definitely think so! nfm

KarenteaMarch 19, 2015 08:07PM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 3 plus 14?
Message: