Welcome to our board! Log In Create A New Profile
Use mobile view

Advanced

Re: CA and Fowle

April 17, 2012 03:50AM
Oh, that's right. I had that confused with something else.
SubjectAuthorPosted

to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 02:23AM

Simply put, no.

TegApril 06, 2012 01:28PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

PhiaApril 06, 2012 10:54AM

Meditations on divorce

NerinApril 09, 2012 02:37PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

mariakApril 06, 2012 08:55AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Nikki NApril 06, 2012 12:02PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

marksApril 11, 2012 12:51PM

The problem is ...

mariakApril 11, 2012 11:06PM

Re: The problem is ...

Nikki NApril 12, 2012 01:30AM

Matthew Macfadyen's influence

Margaret FApril 13, 2012 02:20AM

Re: The problem is ...

mariakApril 12, 2012 07:15AM

Amazing Conversation!

stacyApril 12, 2012 04:34AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

MarksApril 13, 2012 12:09PM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Suzanne OApril 13, 2012 02:04PM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Nikki NApril 14, 2012 10:49AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

MarksApril 15, 2012 11:52AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Nikki NApril 15, 2012 12:17PM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Suzanne OApril 14, 2012 09:47PM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

JanetRApril 15, 2012 04:21AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Suzanne OApril 15, 2012 06:26AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

JanetRApril 15, 2012 07:30AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Suzanne OApril 15, 2012 11:52PM

I agree with you

JanetRApril 16, 2012 02:54AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

mariakApril 15, 2012 08:35AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

MarksApril 14, 2012 04:21AM

Not really...

mariakApril 14, 2012 09:34AM

Re: Amazing Conversation!

Nikki NApril 14, 2012 02:06AM

And I flip again! Re: Amazing Conversation!

AdelaideApril 13, 2012 03:15PM

Re: And I flip again! Re: Amazing Conversation!

MarksApril 14, 2012 04:36AM

Re: And I flip again! Re: Amazing Conversation!

Nikki NApril 14, 2012 05:42AM

Re: And I flip again! Re: Amazing Conversation!

MarksApril 15, 2012 11:36AM

Re: And I flip again! Re: Amazing Conversation!

Nikki NApril 15, 2012 12:02PM

Re: And I flip again! Re: Amazing Conversation!

MarksApril 15, 2012 12:43PM

Particularly well said, Nikki! Re: Amazing Conversation!

AdelaideApril 14, 2012 10:58PM

Elizabeth's figure

Amy I.April 12, 2012 05:10AM

P&P2

mariakApril 12, 2012 07:18AM

Re: The problem is ...

MarksApril 12, 2012 12:44AM

Re: The problem is ...

mariakApril 12, 2012 07:06AM

Re: The problem is ...

MarksApril 13, 2012 11:50AM

Re: The problem is ...

AdelaideApril 13, 2012 01:56PM

Re: Have truly enjoyed reading this thread

Annette PApril 15, 2012 01:29AM

Darcy and Edward Ferrars

Nikki NApril 15, 2012 02:40AM

Re: Darcy and Edward Ferrars

Suzanne OApril 15, 2012 03:06AM

Maybe Darcy and Edward could be likened to Jane and Elizabeth in P&P

AdelaideApril 15, 2012 03:30PM

In defence of Edward Ferrars

UlrikeApril 15, 2012 05:13PM

Nothing he could do

mariakApril 15, 2012 05:54PM

Re: Nothing he could do

UlrikeApril 15, 2012 06:08PM

Re: Nothing he could do?

Nikki NApril 16, 2012 12:21PM

Really? Re: Nothing he could do

AdelaideApril 15, 2012 06:36PM

Re: Really? Re: Nothing he could do

Nikki NApril 16, 2012 05:07AM

Several points...

mariakApril 15, 2012 10:07PM

Re: Several points...

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 12:11AM

Re: Several points...

mariakApril 16, 2012 07:37AM

This is one of those discussions that could go on and on...

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 03:11PM

Re: This is one of those discussions that could go on and on...

Annette PApril 16, 2012 07:21PM

Re: This is one of those discussions that could go on and on...

Suzanne OApril 16, 2012 03:54PM

Re: This is one of those discussions that could go on and on...

Annette PApril 16, 2012 07:25PM

Re: This is one of those discussions that could go on and on...

UlrikeApril 16, 2012 04:30PM

Edmund, not Edward. You know, MP. (nfm)

Suzanne OApril 16, 2012 04:35PM

She snorts derisively... Re: Edmund, not Edward. You know, MP.

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 05:16PM

Re: She snorts derisively... Re: Edmund, not Edward. You know, MP.

Suzanne OApril 16, 2012 07:31PM

Re: She snorts derisively... Re: Edmund, not Edward. You know, MP.

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 08:50PM

Re: UA

Suzanne OApril 16, 2012 09:13PM

Like others, I love the story. Hooked! Re: UA (nfm)

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 09:17PM

Re: She snorts derisively... Re: Edmund, not Edward. You know, MP.

MK BaxleyApril 16, 2012 06:45PM

Sorry, I cannot share that sentiment, MK B.

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 08:41PM

Re: Sorry, I cannot share that sentiment, MK B.

Nikki NApril 17, 2012 01:01AM

Good points about JA villains

AdelaideApril 17, 2012 02:13AM

Re: Sorry, I cannot share that sentiment, MK B.

MK BaxleyApril 16, 2012 09:41PM

Yes, but...

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 10:40PM

Re: Yes, but...

MK BaxleyApril 17, 2012 12:48AM

JA, Lefroy and her novels

Nikki NApril 17, 2012 11:33AM

Re: JA, Lefroy and her novels

LiseApril 17, 2012 11:39AM

Re: JA, Lefroy and her novels

Suzanne OApril 17, 2012 12:09PM

JA and Lefroy

Nikki NApril 17, 2012 01:08AM

Re: JA and Lefroy

MK BaxleyApril 17, 2012 02:16AM

CA and Fowle

JanetRApril 17, 2012 03:40AM

Re: CA and Fowle

MK BaxleyApril 17, 2012 03:50AM

LOL! My bad, sorry! smiling smiley

UlrikeApril 16, 2012 04:49PM

Re: Several points...

Suzanne OApril 16, 2012 12:33AM

Suzanne, you're right probably that I am thinking like a 21st century woman

AdelaideApril 16, 2012 12:44AM

Re: Several points...

Suzanne OApril 15, 2012 11:48PM

Thank you! Doormat not floor mat. Sometimes English fails me, or I, it. (nfm)

AdelaideApril 15, 2012 05:35PM

Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Allison OMApril 07, 2012 11:33PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Annette PApril 15, 2012 01:36AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon - period smiling smiley

MarksApril 11, 2012 12:59PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

LynaeApril 09, 2012 06:10PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

mariakApril 08, 2012 08:59AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Suzanne OApril 08, 2012 02:42PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

mariakApril 08, 2012 04:00PM

Hey, I liked Particular Attachments

Harvey S.April 08, 2012 06:24AM

Re: Hey, I liked Particular Attachments

Annette PApril 15, 2012 01:38AM

Re: Hey, I liked Particular Attachments

AdelaideApril 10, 2012 12:37AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Suzanne OApril 08, 2012 03:19AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Nikki NApril 08, 2012 12:36PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Suzanne OApril 08, 2012 02:53PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Nikki NApril 09, 2012 01:07AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Suzanne OApril 09, 2012 02:04AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

AdelaideApril 09, 2012 03:28PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Suzanne OApril 09, 2012 03:53PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Margaret FApril 13, 2012 02:50AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

AdelaideApril 13, 2012 03:08AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

AdelaideApril 09, 2012 04:32PM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Nikki NApril 10, 2012 02:12AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

UlrikeApril 09, 2012 08:33AM

My favourite..

JoyApril 10, 2012 04:45AM

Re: My favourite..

Nikki NApril 11, 2012 12:47AM

Re: My favourite..

JoyApril 11, 2012 07:49AM

Re: My favourite..

Suzanne OApril 11, 2012 03:16AM

Re: My favourite..

JoyApril 11, 2012 07:29AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

Allison OMApril 07, 2012 11:35PM

My bad--really, no offense intended

MillieApril 08, 2012 12:35AM

Re: Bingley is not stupid in canon (at least not necessarily stupid)

KentApril 08, 2012 12:28AM

Some matches are better than others

MillieApril 06, 2012 10:40PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

lindablancheApril 06, 2012 07:58PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 10:19PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 01:11PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Nikki NApril 07, 2012 01:40AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

AdelaideApril 07, 2012 03:39PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 07, 2012 05:22PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 07, 2012 03:40AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Nikki NApril 06, 2012 06:20AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

JessicalApril 07, 2012 05:50AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 07, 2012 02:29PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 11:11AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Nikki NApril 06, 2012 12:20PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 03:17PM

An engaging discussion... winking smiley

FayApril 06, 2012 05:17AM

Re: An engaging discussion... winking smiley

lindablancheApril 06, 2012 08:01PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

KentApril 06, 2012 03:40AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 03:45AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

KentApril 06, 2012 02:04PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 03:17PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Tessa LApril 06, 2012 05:33PM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

DorisApril 06, 2012 02:30AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Margaret FApril 06, 2012 03:34AM

Re: to marry or not to marry... the ethics of 19th century marriages

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 03:39AM

On Arranged Marriages...

stacyApril 06, 2012 04:51AM

Re: On Arranged Marriages...

Suzanne OApril 06, 2012 05:34AM



Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 18 plus 2?
Message: